'Dublin is not safe enough', says Eamon Ryan as he backs Justice Minister

The speaker expresses a deep connection to Dublin, emphasizing the need for safety and cultural values. They discuss recent safety concerns and the importance of maintaining Dublin's cultural decency. The speaker addresses political reactions to a no-confidence motion against the Minister for Justice, advocating for collective government action to improve safety rather than political dismissals. The conclusion reiterates the need for collaborative efforts in government.

What does the speaker believe about the security of their neighbors?

• It is unrelated to the city's qualities.

• It directly impacts their own sense of security.

• It is solely the government's responsibility.

• It does not affect their own security.

What does the speaker suggest about Dublin's cultural values?

• They are irrelevant to the city's safety.

• They are the cause of recent issues.

• They should be changed to adapt to new times.

• They should be preserved and not be intimidated by recent events.

What is the speaker's stance on the recent no-confidence motion?

• They support removing the Minister of Justice.

• They are undecided about their vote.

• They believe in working collectively within the government.

• They think political changes will solve the problem.

According to the speaker, what is necessary for improving safety?

• Ignoring recent events.

• Removing current government officials.

• Changing Dublin's cultural values.

• Working collectively within the government.

What does the speaker imply about political solutions?

• They should be the first step in addressing concerns.

• They are not sufficient to solve the problem.

• They are irrelevant to the current situation.

• They are the best way to solve safety issues.