Why You Can Buy The Next President | Citizens United v. FEC

In 2007, Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit, sought to release a documentary critical of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 Democratic primaries. This was challenged under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BICRA), which restricted corporate spending on political campaigns. After losing in District Court, Citizens United appealed to the Supreme Court. In 2010, the Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Citizens United, citing the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause, allowing corporations and unions to spend unlimited money on political campaigns, as long as it was independent of candidates. This decision sparked significant debate and protests, with dissenting opinions calling for constitutional amendments to limit money in politics.

What was the main reason Citizens United's documentary was controversial under BICRA?

• It was intended to influence voters against a candidate.

• It was funded by foreign entities.

• It was released too early before the primaries.

• It was a positive portrayal of Hillary Clinton.

What was Citizens United's argument regarding the application of BICRA to their film?

• The film was not clearly for or against any candidate.

• The film was funded by private donations.

• The film was a work of fiction.

• The film was not intended for public release.

What was the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of Citizens United based on?

• The right to privacy.

• The Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.

• The right to a fair trial.

• The right to bear arms.

What concept did the Supreme Court's decision reinforce regarding corporations?

• Corporations cannot be taxed.

• Corporations must disclose all political expenditures.

• Corporations have the same free speech rights as individuals.

• Corporations are not allowed to participate in politics.

Who led the dissenting opinion against the Supreme Court's decision?

• Justice David Souter

• Justice John Paul Stevens

• Justice Sonia Sotomayor

• Justice Anthony Kennedy

What was a major concern of the dissenting opinion regarding the Citizens United ruling?

• It would enable money to have too much influence in politics.

• It would allow foreign influence in elections.

• It would lead to increased corporate taxes.

• It would reduce voter turnout.

What has been a significant public reaction to the Citizens United decision?

• A decrease in political campaign spending.

• Widespread protests and calls for a constitutional amendment.

• Increased support for corporate donations.

• A rise in third-party political candidates.