Data Science and Machine Learning (Theory and Projects) A to Z - Probability Model: Probability Axioms Derivations Solut

Data Science and Machine Learning (Theory and Projects) A to Z - Probability Model: Probability Axioms Derivations Solut

Assessment

Interactive Video

Information Technology (IT), Architecture

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video tutorial explains why the probability of an empty set is zero. It begins by questioning if an event with no elements can have a nonzero probability and concludes that it cannot. The proof is based on the axioms of probability, particularly the probability of a sample space being one and the union of disjoint events. The tutorial demonstrates that if the empty set had a nonzero probability, it would violate these axioms. The explanation is simplified by expressing the sample space as a union with the empty set, leading to the conclusion that the empty set's probability must be zero.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the probability of an empty set?

It depends on the context

It is always one

It is always zero

It can be any value

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the probability of a sample space?

It is undefined

Zero

One

Depends on the events

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

If two events A and B are disjoint, what is the probability of their union?

Probability of A divided by probability of B

Probability of A times probability of B

Probability of A plus probability of B

Probability of A minus probability of B

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why must the probability of an empty set be zero?

To make calculations easier

Because it is a rule of thumb

To ensure the probability of any event does not exceed one

Because it is always one

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What happens if the probability of an empty set is not zero?

It would make the probability of sample space zero

It would have no effect

It would violate the axiom of probability

It would be consistent with probability axioms