Insulate Britain protesters give their reasons for blocking traffic in Parliament Square

The transcript discusses the inefficiency of government subsidies for heating bills compared to the potential benefits of insulating homes. It highlights the speaker's commitment to activism and the moral imperative to act against climate change. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of government action and the impact on future generations, emphasizing the need for civil resistance to drive change.

What is the main issue with the government subsidies for heating bills according to the speaker?

• They are too low to make a difference.

• They are only available to large corporations.

• They are not reaching the people who need them.

• They are much higher than the cost of insulating homes.

Why does the speaker believe civil resistance is necessary?

• Because other methods have failed to bring change.

• Because it is a traditional method of protest.

• Because it is supported by the government.

• Because it is a peaceful way to express dissatisfaction.

What motivates the speaker to continue their activism?

• Financial incentives from organizations.

• Pressure from family and friends.

• A desire for personal recognition.

• A sense of moral duty and justice.

What could have been achieved if the government had started insulating homes 12 months ago?

• A rise in government subsidies for heating bills.

• A reduction in the number of homes needing insulation.

• A significant decrease in national energy consumption.

• An increase in fossil fuel usage.

What is the speaker's view on the future if current trends continue?

• Government policies will eventually catch up.

• Technological advancements will solve the issues.

• The future will be bleak for younger generations.

• The situation will improve naturally over time.