Alex Jones Concedes Sandy Hook Attack Was '100% Real'

The transcript discusses the legal proceedings involving Alex Jones, focusing on a default judgment by Judge Gamble due to missing evidence related to Sandy Hook. Jones admitted in court that the Sandy Hook massacre was real, contradicting his previous statements. The closing arguments emphasized the distinction between free speech and lies, with the plaintiffs seeking $150 million. The impact of perjury on legal credibility is highlighted, and another defamation case against Jones in Connecticut is mentioned.

What was the primary reason for Judge Gamble's default judgment against Alex Jones?

• Jones's failure to appear in court

• Jones's refusal to testify

• Jones's failure to provide evidence during discovery

• Jones's admission of guilt

What significant statement did Alex Jones make in court regarding the Sandy Hook massacre?

• He claimed it was a hoax

• He blamed the media for misinformation

• He refused to comment

• He admitted it was real

What argument did the plaintiffs make regarding free speech and lies?

• Free speech allows for any statement

• Lies are protected under free speech

• Free speech is free, but lies have consequences

• Lies are a form of free speech

How can perjury affect a legal case?

• It can lead to immediate dismissal

• It can damage the credibility of the accused

• It has no impact on the case

• It results in automatic conviction

What is the potential financial consequence Alex Jones faces in this trial?

• $100 million

• $50 million

• $200 million

• $150 million