27-Year-Old Man Arrested For Impregnating 10-Year-Old Girl In Ohio

The transcript discusses a case involving a 10-year-old girl from Ohio who traveled to Indiana for an abortion after being impregnated. The case highlights the impact of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, sparking public outrage and political debate. Media outlets and politicians questioned the story's validity, while legal investigations were initiated to ensure compliance with reporting laws. Dr. Caitlin Bernard, who performed the abortion, confirmed she reported the procedure within the required timeframe.

Why did the 10-year-old girl travel to Indiana for an abortion?

• Indiana has no abortion restrictions.

• Indiana offered free medical services.

• She was past the legal time frame for an abortion in Ohio.

• Her family lived in Indiana.

What was the reaction of the President of the United States to the case?

• He supported the Ohio law.

• He expressed sympathy and outrage.

• He criticized the girl's family.

• He remained neutral.

How did right-wing media respond to the story?

• They confirmed the story immediately.

• They denied the story and called it a lie.

• They supported the girl's decision.

• They ignored the story completely.

What did Ohio's Attorney General, Dave Yost, do after initially denying the facts of the case?

• He resigned from his position.

• He confirmed the facts after securing a confession.

• He continued to deny the facts.

• He apologized to the girl's family.

What did Dr. Caitlin Bernard do in compliance with the law after performing the abortion?

• She reported it after a month.

• She reported it within the required three days.

• She did not report the case.

• She refused to comment on the case.