Brooklyn Subway Shooting Suspect in Custody

The video discusses the terrorism-related charges against Frank James, highlighting the decision to pursue federal prosecution due to the severity of the charges under Title 18 USC 1992. It explains the collaboration between local and federal law enforcement agencies, such as the NYPD and FBI, in handling the case. The video also covers the role of Frank James' prior criminal history in court proceedings and the admissibility of social media evidence. It emphasizes the impact of technology and surveillance in modern investigations, noting the use of public records and quick identification methods.

What is the main reason for charging Frank James federally under Title 18 USC 1992?

• Due to the severity of the charges and potential life sentence

• To ensure a fair trial

• To involve more law enforcement agencies

• Because local courts are overburdened

Which agencies collaborated in the investigation of Frank James?

• Local police, ATF, and Secret Service

• FBI, CIA, and Homeland Security

• CIA, NYPD, and local police

• NYPD, FBI, and ATF

How is the decision made whether to prosecute a case federally or locally?

• By the preference of the suspect

• Based on the location of the crime

• By the severity of the crime and potential exposure

• Through a public vote

What is the expectation of privacy for social media posts in legal proceedings?

• They are completely private

• They are public and admissible in court

• They require a warrant to be used

• They are only admissible with the user's consent

What role did surveillance play in the identification of Frank James?

• It was not used at all

• It helped identify him despite some camera failures

• It was the sole method of identification

• It delayed the investigation