The Sheep and the Wolves: Nietzsche's View on Biological Makeup and Moral Codes

The video explores Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy on the division of the world into 'sheep' and 'wolves', representing herd and loner species. It discusses how morality is influenced by biological nature, with different moral codes arising from different biological traits. Nietzsche's concept of master and slave types is examined, highlighting traits like strength and conformity. The video also addresses the historical inversion of moral values, where traits of strength and power are now condemned, while meekness is praised.

What does Nietzsche suggest about the division of organic nature?

• It is divided into sheep and wolves.

• It is divided into plants and animals.

• It is divided into predators and prey only.

• It is divided into humans and non-humans.

According to Nietzsche, what traits do 'master' types possess?

• Meekness and conformity

• Strength, creativity, and independence

• Fearfulness and herd mentality

• Passivity and dependence

What is the natural inclination of 'slave' types according to Nietzsche?

• To rebel against social norms

• To dominate and lead

• To seek adventure and independence

• To conform and seek security

How does Nietzsche describe the moral codes of sheep and wolves?

• They are irrelevant to survival.

• They differ due to biological nature.

• They are based on societal laws.

• They are identical for both.

What does Nietzsche believe about the relationship between biological makeup and moral codes?

• Biological makeup dictates moral codes.

• Moral codes dictate biological makeup.

• They are unrelated.

• They are determined by societal norms.

What does Nietzsche argue about the historical change in moral values?

• The strong have always been praised.

• The meek have always been condemned.

• The morality of the weak has become dominant.

• Moral values have remained constant.

What is the key problem Nietzsche identifies with current moral values?

• They are too focused on power.

• They have become too lenient.

• They are too rigid and unchanging.

• They have inverted, favoring the weak.