Biden Signs Law Punishing China for Uyghur Treatment

The transcript discusses a unanimous vote on a bill affecting companies importing goods from Xinjiang, presumed to be made with forced labor. Companies must prove otherwise to import into the US. Intel's case is highlighted, showing the challenges of balancing regulatory compliance and global expansion. Political reactions suggest companies may need to choose between expanding in the US or China, with bipartisan interest in addressing these issues.

What is the main presumption about goods coming from the Xinjiang region under the new regulation?

• They are made with high-quality materials.

• They are made with forced labor.

• They are environmentally friendly.

• They are tax-free.

What must companies do to prove their goods are not made with forced labor?

• Partner with local businesses.

• Offer discounts to US consumers.

• Provide evidence to the Customs and Border Protection Agency.

• Submit a marketing plan.

How does the new regulation change the burden of proof for companies?

• It eliminates the need for any proof.

• It makes it easier for companies to import goods.

• It places the burden of proof on the government.

• It requires companies to prove their goods are not made with forced labor.

Why did Intel face criticism from the Chinese government?

• For not investing in renewable energy.

• For increasing prices of their products.

• For pulling back from the Xinjiang region due to forced labor issues.

• For expanding operations in Europe.

What choice are companies like Intel being pressured to make according to US politicians?

• To choose between investing in technology or real estate.

• To choose between hiring local or international employees.

• To choose between expanding in the US or China.

• To choose between producing semiconductors or software.