CLEAN : Hong Kong leader says press must not 'subvert' government

CLEAN : Hong Kong leader says press must not 'subvert' government

Assessment

Interactive Video

Journalism, Social Studies, Other

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the arrest related to the national security law in Hong Kong, addressing accusations of media suppression and freedom of expression. It emphasizes the importance of legal judgment based on evidence and the role of journalists. The conversation also includes cultural and social commentary, highlighting the broader implications of the national security law.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the main argument against the limits on outdoor gatherings?

They are necessary for public safety.

They are seen as a violation of personal freedom.

They help in controlling the spread of misinformation.

They are supported by international law.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do the Hong Kong authorities respond to accusations of using the national security law to suppress media?

They refuse to comment on the matter.

They plan to revise the law.

They claim the accusations are incorrect.

They agree with the accusations.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is emphasized about the role of journalists in the context of the national security law?

Journalists should focus on entertainment news.

Journalists should support government actions.

Journalists should be able to judge legal boundaries.

Journalists should avoid reporting on legal matters.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the consequence of violating the national security law as mentioned in the transcript?

It is ignored by the legal system.

It brings the case to court.

It results in a fine.

It leads to a warning from authorities.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the nature of the statements in the final section of the transcript?

They seem unrelated and possibly indicate a shift in focus.

They summarize the entire discussion.

They are directly related to the main topic.

They provide a detailed legal analysis.