CLEAN : China: Canadian official 'disappointed' with lack of transparency in Spavor, Kovrig process

The transcript discusses the issue of arbitrary detention of Canadian citizens in China, highlighting the concern and demand for their release. It mentions the surprise of ongoing hearings after two years and the lack of transparency in the process. The transcript also covers the legal obligations under the Vienna Convention and Canada's bilateral agreement with China, emphasizing the need for Canadian officials to gain access to court proceedings.

What is the main concern expressed in the first section regarding the detained individuals?

• They are being released soon.

• Their detention is justified.

• Their detention is arbitrary and has lasted over two years.

• They have been given a fair trial.

What unexpected event is mentioned in the second section?

• The media was allowed in the courtroom.

• The detainees were released.

• The hearings are taking place.

• The diplomats were given access.

What was the reaction to the lack of transparency in the hearing process?

• Approval

• Indifference

• Disappointment

• Satisfaction

According to the third section, what does the Vienna Convention require?

• China to provide media access to the courtroom.

• Canada to close its embassy in China.

• China to allow Canadian officials to attend court proceedings.

• China to release all detainees.

What is the purpose of the Canadian officials' presence at the court?

• To negotiate a trade deal.

• To gain access to the court proceedings.

• To protest against the Chinese government.

• To provide legal representation to the detainees.