Street art depicting Boris strung up removed

The speaker discusses a controversial image depicting Boris Johnson, which was displayed in Northfield Town Center. The image sparked online debate about the appropriateness of depicting violence against politicians. The speaker clarifies that they do not condone violence but used the image to provoke thought and discussion about political accountability. They highlight the disparity in reactions to images versus real-world violence and express surprise at the image's longevity in a conservative area. The speaker reflects on the nature of public discourse, especially on platforms like Twitter, and emphasizes the need for collective action against systemic issues.

What was the speaker's main reason for using a shocking image of Boris Johnson?

• To draw attention to political accountability

• To support a political party

• To entertain the public

• To promote violence against politicians

How did the speaker feel about the mixed reactions to the image?

• They were indifferent to the reactions

• They regretted posting the image

• They were pleased that it sparked conversation

• They were disappointed by the lack of attention

What platform did the speaker mention as having the most intense reactions?

• Twitter

• Facebook

• YouTube

• Instagram

Why did the speaker choose Northfield as the location for the image?

• It is a popular tourist spot

• It is a liberal area

• It is a conservative constituency

• It is their hometown

What was the speaker's expectation regarding Gary Sambrook's reaction to the image?

• That he would have it removed

• That he would ignore the image

• That he would promote the image

• That he would support the image