Poland, Hungary Budget Stance ‘Irresponsible’: European People's Party

The transcript discusses the EU's internal political dynamics, focusing on Viktor Orban's role and the potential for a Plan B if Hungary and Poland veto EU plans. It highlights the importance of a rule of law mechanism linked to EU funding and explores possible compromises. The discussion also covers future-oriented investments and national responsibilities, with criticism of the EPP's handling of Orban.

What is the main concern of the European Parliament regarding the actions of Viktor Orban and the Polish Prime Minister?

• They are blocking the EU's progress for political interests.

• They are enhancing media freedom.

• They are supporting the EU's economic recovery.

• They are promoting the rule of law.

What is the proposed solution if Poland and Hungary veto the EU package?

• A new negotiation with all members.

• A complete withdrawal of the package.

• A 25 Member State solution.

• A 27 Member State agreement.

What is the European Parliament's stance on the rule of law mechanism?

• It should be revised completely.

• It should be abolished.

• It should remain unchanged.

• It should be watered down.

What is emphasized as crucial for the spending of EU funds?

• Immediate distribution to all member states.

• Use as a cash machine for national budgets.

• Investment in future-oriented projects.

• Allocation based on population size.

What criticism is directed at the EPP regarding Viktor Orban?

• They have supported his policies.

• They have been too lenient with him.

• They have ignored his actions.

• They have expelled him from the party.

What role does the European Court of Justice play in the EU?

• It negotiates with non-EU countries.

• It creates new EU laws.

• It ensures compliance with EU standards.

• It manages EU finances.

What is the European Parliament's position on media freedom?

• It should be restricted.

• It is not a priority.

• It must be defended.

• It should be controlled by the state.