Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court To Allow 'Remain In Mexico' Law

The video discusses the Remain in Mexico asylum policy, highlighting recent legal challenges and court rulings. The 9th Circuit Court deemed it unlawful to require asylum seekers to wait in Mexico, prompting a Supreme Court review. The Justice Department argues the policy reduces border crossings, while critics highlight the dangers faced by migrants in border areas.

What was the decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the 'Remain in Mexico' policy?

• It was postponed for further review.

• It was expanded to more states.

• It was deemed unlawful.

• It was upheld as lawful.

Why did the Justice Department argue against axing the 'Remain in Mexico' policy?

• It could lead to a rush at the border.

• It would increase legal costs.

• It would affect trade agreements.

• It would decrease border security funding.

What temporary measure did the 9th Circuit Court take regarding the policy?

• They permanently removed the policy.

• They extended the policy indefinitely.

• They granted a stay until March 12th.

• They transferred the case to another court.

How many people with pending asylum cases have been returned to Mexico under the policy?

• 60,000

• 30,000

• 100,000

• 10,000

What concerns do immigrant rights groups have about the 'Remain in Mexico' policy?

• It increases legal fees for migrants.

• It forces migrants to wait in dangerous areas.

• It affects diplomatic relations with Mexico.

• It reduces the number of asylum applications.