Bill Banning Treatments For Transgender Youth Fails In South Dakota

Bill Banning Treatments For Transgender Youth Fails In South Dakota

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

House Bill 1057, which aimed to criminalize certain medical treatments for transgender youth, was effectively defeated in South Dakota. The bill would have penalized medical professionals for performing gender confirmation surgeries or providing hormone therapy to minors under 16. The ACLU and others opposed the bill, viewing it as discriminatory. The bill's sponsor anticipated its defeat but appreciated the discussion it generated.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the outcome of the state Senate Health and Human Services Committee's vote on House Bill 1057?

The bill was signed into law.

The bill was sent back to the House of Representatives.

The bill was moved to the 41st day, effectively defeating it.

The bill was passed unanimously.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What age group was targeted by House Bill 1057 for restrictions on medical treatments?

Under 16

Under 18

Under 21

Under 14

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What penalties were proposed for medical professionals violating House Bill 1057?

A fine up to $2000 or up to one year in jail

A fine up to $5000 or up to two years in jail

A fine up to $3000 or up to three years in jail

A fine up to $1000 or up to six months in jail

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the ACLU react to the defeat of House Bill 1057?

They called for further amendments to the bill.

They remained neutral on the issue.

They praised the bill's defeat.

They were disappointed with the decision.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What broader message did the defeat of House Bill 1057 send according to the ACLU?

It emphasized the importance of protecting marginalized groups.

It demonstrated the power of public opinion.

It highlighted the need for more legislative sessions.

It showed the necessity of stricter laws.