Damage to Nissan, Renault and Japan Quite Serious, Says Professor Givens

The transcript discusses Carlos Goen's performance in defending himself against charges, arguing they were weak and part of a corporate coup. It highlights the impact on Nissan, Renault, and Japan, noting a significant market cap loss. The Japanese justice system is critiqued for its high conviction rate and harsh procedures. The corporate relationship between Nissan and Renault is examined, revealing tensions and Goen's autocratic leadership style.

What was one of the main arguments Carlos Ghosn made in his defense?

• The charges were weak and part of a plot.

• The Japanese justice system is fair.

• The charges were strong and justified.

• He had no plans to merge Nissan and Renault.

What financial impact did the case have on Nissan?

• Increased market cap by $10 billion.

• No impact on market cap.

• Decreased market cap by $10 billion.

• Increased market cap by $5 billion.

How did the Japanese government respond to Ghosn's claims about the justice system?

• They ignored his claims completely.

• They dismissed his claims as one-sided.

• They found his claims persuasive.

• They agreed with his claims.

What leadership style did Ghosn reportedly use at Nissan?

• Democratic and inclusive.

• Autocratic and decisive.

• Laissez-faire and hands-off.

• Collaborative and consensus-based.

What was a significant issue in the Nissan-Renault alliance under Ghosn's leadership?

• Lack of any formal alliance.

• Equal partnership with no issues.

• Nissan's dominance over Renault.

• Renault's dominance over Nissan.