Google Workers Rising Up After Employees Are Fired

The transcript discusses the controversy surrounding the firing of Google employees, who claim they were dismissed for activism rather than data security policy violations. The data security policy is criticized for being vague and selectively enforced. Employees and media reports suggest the policy is not well-known or consistently applied, leading to internal dissent and public discussion.

What is the main reason given for the firing of employees at Google, according to the first section?

• Budget cuts

• Data security policy violations

• Poor performance

• Activism and organizing

How does Rebecca describe Google's data security policy?

• Outdated and irrelevant

• Vaguely written and selectively enforced

• Strict and consistently applied

• Clearly written and fair

What does the retroactive classification of documents as 'Need to Know' imply?

• Documents can be accessed by anyone

• Documents can be classified after being accessed

• Documents are always classified before access

• Documents are never classified

What is the general sentiment among employees regarding the data security policy, as reported by Mark?

• It is a policy that everyone agrees with

• It is a new and unclear policy

• It is a longstanding and well-known policy

• It is a policy that has been consistently applied

How did employees react to the data security policy according to the third section?

• They spoke up publicly against it

• They were indifferent

• They accepted it without question

• They supported it wholeheartedly