Judges To Decide If WH Employees Can Ignore Congressional Subpoenas

The video discusses the role of judicial rulings in the House impeachment investigation, focusing on subpoenas issued to former White House officials Don McGahn and Charles Kupperman. McGahn was subpoenaed in April but did not comply, leading to a lawsuit by the House Judiciary Committee. Kupperman, subpoenaed in October, filed a civil case seeking judicial guidance on compliance. The video explores the legal arguments, including claims of absolute immunity, and highlights the struggle to obtain testimony from Trump administration officials. The outcomes of these cases could clarify whether White House officials can ignore congressional subpoenas.

What was the reason for Don McGahn's subpoena by the House Judiciary Committee?

• To investigate possible obstruction of justice by President Trump

• To investigate financial misconduct

• To testify about foreign policy decisions

• To provide information on election interference

Why did Charles Kupperman file a civil case with the DC District Court?

• To seek immunity from testifying

• To get a judicial decision on whether to comply with the House subpoena

• To request a delay in his deposition

• To challenge the legality of the impeachment inquiry

What is the main legal argument in McGahn's case against the House Judiciary Committee?

• McGahn claims executive privilege over all documents

• McGahn argues the subpoena is unconstitutional

• The president's claim of absolute immunity for McGahn

• The subpoena was issued without proper authority

What is the key issue that the judges' decisions in the McGahn and Kupperman cases aim to resolve?

• The validity of the subpoenas issued

• The legality of the impeachment inquiry

• Whether White House officials can ignore congressional subpoenas

• The scope of executive privilege

What challenge have lawmakers faced in obtaining testimony from Trump administration witnesses?

• Witnesses have been outside the country

• Witnesses have been unavailable due to scheduling conflicts

• Witnesses have refused to testify citing executive privilege

• Witnesses have claimed diplomatic immunity