How are Justin Bieber, Franz Liszt and Jerusalem Connected?

The video explores the psychological and cultural impact of fandoms, comparing historical figures like Franz Liszt with modern celebrities like Justin Bieber. It delves into the concept of 'Lisztomania' and 'Bieber Fever', highlighting the intense fan reactions. The discussion extends to the psychological effects of art, such as Stendhal syndrome, and the cultural significance of beauty. Philosophical insights from Maurice Merleau-Ponty are used to explain how perception and cultural experiences shape our reactions to art and music.

What is a common psychological effect shared by fans of both Justin Bieber and Franz Liszt?

• They both cause extreme emotional reactions.

• They both have similar musical styles.

• They both inspire fans to learn music.

• They both have a large number of albums.

What term was coined to describe the hysteria surrounding Franz Liszt's concerts?

• Bieber Fever

• Beatlemania

• Lisztomania

• Hulkamania

Which syndrome is associated with extreme reactions to art due to its beauty?

• Jerusalem Syndrome

• Paris Syndrome

• Stendhal Syndrome

• Florence Syndrome

What is a common feature of Stendhal, Jerusalem, and Paris syndromes?

• They all involve physical illness.

• They all involve listening to music.

• They all involve extreme cultural or religious experiences.

• They all involve travel to the United States.

According to the philosophical perspective discussed, what combines with quality to create a strong impact in art?

• Technical skill

• Popularity

• Cultural connection

• Historical significance

What does the philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty suggest about our perception of art?

• We analyze the technical details.

• We focus on the artist's biography.

• We merge with the object and experience it fully.

• We compare it to other artworks.

What is suggested as a reason why not all art and performances achieve the success of Justin Bieber or the Mona Lisa?

• Lack of marketing

• Insufficient cultural significance

• Poor quality

• Limited audience