Kavanaugh a 'Fervent Defender' of Individual Rights, Says Ken Starr

The transcript discusses Brett Kavanaugh's character, work ethic, and judicial temperament, highlighting his intellectual honesty and open-mindedness. It places him within the conservative tradition of constitutional law, emphasizing his commitment to individual rights and democratic processes. The discussion also covers Kavanaugh's views on accountability in government and the administrative state, as well as potential Supreme Court cases involving separation of powers and executive branch investigations.

What personal quality of Brett Kavanaugh is highlighted as being particularly notable?

• His intellectual honesty

• His sense of humor

• His athletic ability

• His artistic talent

In which tradition of constitutional law is Brett Kavanaugh placed?

• Progressive tradition

• Liberal tradition

• Conservative tradition

• Libertarian tradition

What is a key aspect of Kavanaugh's approach to the Bill of Rights?

• He finds it outdated

• He interprets it broadly

• He ignores it

• He interprets it narrowly

What is Brett Kavanaugh's stance on the accountability of government agencies?

• He believes they should have more independence

• He believes they are already too accountable

• He wants them to be abolished

• He thinks they should be more accountable

What is one of the main issues Kavanaugh is known for in administrative law?

• Increasing agency funding

• Reducing agency staff

• Supporting agency independence

• Striking down agency decisions

What potential issue might the Supreme Court face regarding presidential investigations?

• The President's ability to declare war

• The President's power to appoint judges

• The issuance of a subpoena to the President

• The legality of presidential pardons

What unresolved question is mentioned in relation to the executive branch?

• Can a special counsel subpoena the President?

• Can the President dissolve Congress?

• Can the President veto a Supreme Court decision?

• Can the President appoint a Supreme Court Justice without approval?