Harvard Study Finds Admissions Bias Against Asian-Americans

The transcript discusses a lawsuit against Harvard University, alleging discrimination against Asian American students in its admissions process. Harvard defends its holistic review approach, while plaintiffs argue that subjective criteria lead to bias. The case draws parallels to historical discrimination against Jewish applicants. The debate touches on affirmative action and its potential impact on minority admissions, with the possibility of reaching the Supreme Court.

What is the main allegation against Harvard in the lawsuit filed by the group representing Asian American students?

• Harvard is accused of not providing enough scholarships.

• Harvard is accused of lowering academic standards.

• Harvard is accused of discriminating against Asian American students in its admissions process.

• Harvard is accused of financial misconduct.

What criteria, besides academic performance, does Harvard consider in its admissions process?

• Only GPA

• Only SAT scores

• Only extracurricular activities

• Subjective traits like likability and courage

How does the current lawsuit against Harvard compare to historical events?

• It is similar to past discrimination against Jewish applicants in the 1920s and 30s.

• It is similar to sports-related controversies.

• It is unrelated to any historical events.

• It is similar to financial scandals in the 1980s.

What potential impact could the lawsuit have on affirmative action policies?

• It could strengthen affirmative action policies.

• It could lead to the elimination of affirmative action policies.

• It could have no impact on affirmative action policies.

• It could only affect financial aid policies.

Who is Edward Blum and what is his role in the lawsuit?

• A lawyer representing Harvard

• A student applying to Harvard

• The founder of the group representing the plaintiffs, known for challenging race-based decisions

• A Harvard professor defending the university