Self Report Methods in Psychology

The video discusses self-report methods in psychology, focusing on questionnaires and interviews. It explains the structure, strengths, and limitations of questionnaires, such as their ability to gather data quickly but lack depth. Interviews offer more depth and flexibility but are time-consuming and may introduce observer bias. The video emphasizes selecting the appropriate method based on research needs and suggests using triangulation to enhance data validity. Common issues like memory reliability and demand characteristics are also highlighted.

What is a key characteristic of questionnaires that ensures all participants receive the same questions?

• They are flexible.

• They are subjective.

• They are open-ended.

• They are structured.

Which of the following is a limitation of questionnaires?

• They are expensive to administer.

• They provide detailed insights.

• They lack flexibility for follow-up questions.

• They are time-consuming to analyze.

What is one advantage of using interviews over questionnaires?

• They provide more depth and validity.

• They offer standardized data.

• They are quicker to conduct.

• They are less prone to observer bias.

Why might interviews be considered less reliable than questionnaires?

• They require less interpretation.

• They are always structured.

• Each interview can vary significantly.

• They are less costly.

When is it more appropriate to use a questionnaire instead of an interview?

• When exploring complex emotional responses.

• When needing to clarify responses.

• When collecting straightforward factual data.

• When seeking detailed personal experiences.

What is a common issue with self-report methods related to memory?

• Memory enhances data validity.

• Memory is not used in self-reports.

• Memory can be unreliable.

• Memory is always accurate.

What is meant by 'demand characteristics' in self-report methods?

• Participants may respond based on what they think is expected.

• Participants' responses are always valid.

• Participants always tell the truth.

• Participants have no influence on the data.