Judge Rules Donald Trump Can't Block Users on Twitter | THR News

A federal judge ruled that President Trump cannot block Twitter users based on their political views, as it violates the 1st Amendment. The lawsuit, filed by Twitter users and the Knight First Amendment Institute, argued that Trump's Twitter account is a public forum. The court's decision extends to all public officials, emphasizing that no one is above the law. The ruling may lead to more litigation against officials who block users on social media. The court expects Trump to comply with the ruling without needing an injunction.

What was the main reason the lawsuit was filed against the President regarding Twitter?

• He was accused of spreading false information.

• He deleted his tweets frequently.

• He blocked users based on their political opinions.

• He used Twitter for personal business.

What was the Department of Justice's argument regarding the President's use of Twitter?

• It is irrelevant to public discourse.

• It is a private matter.

• It is not regulated by the First Amendment.

• It is protected by the First Amendment.

What did the judge conclude about Twitter in relation to the First Amendment?

• Twitter is a private platform.

• Twitter is not subject to legal scrutiny.

• Twitter is a designated public forum.

• Twitter is a commercial entity.

How does the ruling affect other public officials besides the President?

• It extends to all public officials.

• It is limited to state officials.

• It only applies to the President.

• It applies only to federal officials.

What did the judge decide regarding the need for an injunction against the President?

• A fine was imposed instead.

• No action was necessary.

• Declaratory relief was deemed sufficient.

• An injunction was issued immediately.