AT&T Targets Trump in Its Battle for Time Warner

The transcript discusses AT&T's legal strategy in an antitrust case involving the Department of Justice. AT&T aims to include the head of the Antitrust Division as a witness to explore potential presidential interference in the investigation. The legality of this move is debated, as it is unprecedented for a president to interfere in such matters. The court will decide if the testimony is relevant, with potential risks for both AT&T and the government depending on the outcome.

What is AT&T's main objective in including the head of the Antitrust Division as a witness?

• To prove the merger is beneficial

• To gather evidence of presidential interference

• To delay the trial

• To gain public support

Why is the situation with AT&T and the Antitrust Division considered unusual?

• Because it is a common legal strategy

• Due to the potential presidential interference

• Because it involves a large financial transaction

• Due to the involvement of multiple companies

What could be a potential outcome if the head of the Antitrust Division testifies?

• The trial could be postponed

• The merger could be approved immediately

• The testimony could reveal anti-competitive practices

• The testimony could support the government's case

What is a primary risk for AT&T in pursuing this strategy?

• The merger could be automatically approved

• The head of the division could become a strong witness for the government

• The trial could be dismissed

• The company could face additional fines

What might happen if evidence of interference is found?

• The merger could be fast-tracked

• AT&T could face new charges

• The government's case could be weakened

• The trial could be moved to a different court