Aviva CEO Says Brexit Labels Are 'Totally Irrelevant'

Aviva CEO Says Brexit Labels Are 'Totally Irrelevant'

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

Mark Wilson, CEO of Aviva, discusses a recent meeting with UK government officials, highlighting a pro-business tone. He emphasizes the need for clear transitional arrangements post-Brexit to ensure economic stability. Aviva's business in the UK is growing across various sectors, despite currency fluctuations. Wilson advises caution regarding interest rate hikes due to ongoing Brexit uncertainties.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main takeaway from Mark Wilson's meeting with the UK government?

The government is prioritizing healthcare reforms.

The government plans to increase taxes on businesses.

There is a new pro-business tone from the government.

The government is focusing on environmental issues.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to Mark Wilson, what is crucial for Brexit negotiations?

The labels like 'hard Brexit' and 'soft Brexit'.

The terms and deals agreed upon.

The political headlines.

The length of the negotiation period.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has Brexit impacted Aviva's business in the UK?

It has led to a decline in all segments.

There has been growth in various segments.

It has only affected the car insurance segment.

The business has completely halted.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Mark Wilson's view on the potential interest rate hike by the Bank of England?

He feels it will have no impact on the economy.

He thinks it should be delayed due to uncertainties.

He believes it should happen immediately.

He supports a significant increase in rates.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What effect does Mark Wilson suggest a rate hike could have on savers?

It would benefit savers by making annuities more competitive.

It would be detrimental to savers.

It would have no effect on savers.

It would make annuities less competitive.