Should Apple Unlock the Terrorist's i-Phone?

The video discusses the conflict between Apple and the federal government over unlocking an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook, a San Bernardino shooter. The government wants Apple to create a backdoor to access the phone, citing the All Writs Act of 1789. Apple argues this sets a dangerous precedent for privacy and security. The video explores legal, technical, and ethical implications, as well as public and political reactions, including calls for boycotts. It concludes by questioning whether this is a legitimate use of the All Writs Act or a threat to privacy.

What event triggered the discussion about Apple's security measures?

• A lawsuit against Apple

• A new iPhone model release

• A data breach at Apple

• The San Bernardino shooting

Which act is the federal government using to try to compel Apple to unlock the iPhone?

• The All Writs Act

• The Patriot Act

• The Privacy Act

• The Communications Act

What is Apple's main concern about creating a backdoor for the government?

• It would require new technology

• It would be too costly

• It would slow down their devices

• It could set a dangerous precedent

What argument do some political figures make in favor of unlocking the iPhone?

• It will enhance user experience

• It will increase Apple's market share

• It will boost the economy

• It will help prevent terrorism

What does Apple claim about the potential consequences of creating a backdoor?

• The genie cannot be put back in the bottle

• It will increase sales

• It will improve security

• It will be a one-time solution