Australia PM Turnbull Supports Swift, Just U.S. Response

The transcript discusses the Syrian government's use of chemical weapons and the United States' response, which Australia supports. It highlights Australia's commitment to military operations in Iraq and Syria and condemns the use of chemical weapons as illegal and a war crime. The text also addresses the Security Council's impasse due to Russia's support for the Assad regime and emphasizes the global intolerance for chemical weapons.

What was the nature of the United States' response to the Syrian government's use of chemical weapons?

• A random and unplanned attack

• A delayed and hesitant reaction

• A calibrated and targeted response

• A secretive and undisclosed operation

How does the Australian Government view the use of chemical weapons?

• As a necessary evil in warfare

• As a strategic advantage

• As a violation of international law and a war crime

• As a minor infraction

What is the stance of the Australian Government regarding the perpetrators of chemical weapon attacks?

• They should be rewarded

• They should be ignored

• They should be given asylum

• They must be held accountable

What is causing the Security Council to be at an impasse regarding the Syrian conflict?

• Disagreements over military strategies

• Financial constraints

• Support for the Assad regime by Russia

• Lack of interest from member countries

What message does the global community want to send regarding the use of chemical weapons?

• It will be tolerated under certain conditions

• It is acceptable in warfare

• It will not be tolerated under any circumstances

• It is a negotiable issue