Alan Dershowitz Says New Travel Order 'Carefully Written'

The transcript discusses the legal intricacies of a revised executive order, focusing on its constitutionality and potential legal challenges. It highlights the careful drafting of the document by lawyers and the State Department to withstand court scrutiny. Despite the removal of Iraq from the list of banned nations, challenges are expected, particularly from the ACLU and state attorneys general, due to perceived religious discrimination. The Supreme Court's focus on the text rather than the president's past statements is emphasized, suggesting the order may ultimately be upheld.

What is the significance of the document being vetted by the State Department?

• It increases the likelihood of the document being found constitutional.

• It ensures the document is free of grammatical errors.

• It guarantees the document will not face any legal challenges.

• It means the document is supported by all political parties.

Which organization is mentioned as already preparing to challenge the executive order?

• The ACLU

• The World Health Organization

• The United Nations

• The Federal Bureau of Investigation

What is the main argument against the executive order based on the inclusion of certain nations?

• It is too costly to implement.

• It violates international trade agreements.

• It constitutes discrimination against a specific religion.

• It increases national security risks.

How does the Supreme Court typically approach the review of executive orders?

• By focusing on the motives behind the order.

• By analyzing the text and words of the order.

• By consulting international legal experts.

• By considering public opinion polls.

What factor might reduce the impact of President Trump's past statements on the court's decision?

• The length of time since the statements were made.

• The economic benefits of the order.

• The support of international allies.

• The order's revision to remove preferences for minority religions.