Will Trump’s New Travel Order Be Enforced?

The video discusses changes to the U.S. travel ban, focusing on the exclusion of Iraq and the compliance requirements for other countries. It highlights the impact on lawful permanent residents and the constitutional rights involved. The ACLU's criticism of the ban's security justifications is addressed, along with the President's authority on national security. Legal challenges, particularly from the 9th Circuit, are explored, including issues of religious discrimination. The video concludes with speculation on the future enforcement and defense of the travel ban.

What was a significant change in the travel ban regarding lawful permanent residents?

• They were excluded from the ban.

• They were allowed to travel without restrictions.

• They were given priority entry.

• They were required to reapply for green cards.

Why was Iraq removed from the list of banned countries?

• Iraq threatened to retaliate.

• Iraq was never on the list.

• Iraq implemented additional security measures.

• Iraq refused to comply with U.S. demands.

What was the ACLU's stance on the new travel order?

• They supported it.

• They believed it was justified.

• They vowed to fight it.

• They were indifferent.

What constitutional responsibility does the President have concerning national security?

• To delegate security decisions to the states.

• To consult with Congress on all security matters.

• To prioritize economic policies over security.

• To protect the borders and ensure national security.

What was a concern of the 9th Circuit regarding the travel ban?

• It was too lenient.

• It favored certain countries over others.

• It excluded people with green cards.

• It was not enforced strictly enough.