Ross: Contradiction in Obama's Middle East Policy

The transcript discusses the US Middle East peace efforts, focusing on a recent vote's significance. It highlights the historical context of Security Council resolutions on settlements and the implications of the current resolution. The discussion includes the politics of settlement blocs, the two-state solution, and the Obama administration's stance. The video also examines US-Israel relations, addressing criticisms and perceptions of bias.

What was the significance of the recent UN Security Council vote discussed in the video?

• It called for immediate peace talks.

• It recognized Palestinian statehood.

• It supported the expansion of Israeli settlements.

• It was the first resolution on settlements since 1980.

What is the main contradiction in the Obama administration's position on Israeli settlements?

• Ignoring Palestinian actions.

• Encouraging a one-state solution.

• Criticizing Israel while providing security aid.

• Supporting both settlement blocs and illegal settlements.

What potential outcome does Secretary Kerry warn about in his speech?

• A one-state outcome.

• A three-state solution.

• Immediate peace talks.

• Increased US military presence.

How does the Obama administration's criticism of Israel affect perceptions?

• It creates a perception of bias against Israel.

• It results in more US aid to Israel.

• It strengthens US-Israel relations.

• It leads to increased settlement building.

What substantial support did the Obama administration provide to Israel?

• Support for all settlement expansions.

• A new trade agreement.

• Recognition of Jerusalem as the capital.

• A 10-year $38 billion security package.