How Close to 'Business as Usual' Would a Clinton Win Be?

How Close to 'Business as Usual' Would a Clinton Win Be?

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses the market's reaction to the U.S. election, highlighting the volatility and uncertainty surrounding the potential outcomes. It examines the implications of a Clinton or Trump win, focusing on market responses and political dynamics. The discussion also touches on the economic focus post-election, particularly regarding the Federal Reserve and wage pressures. The changing political dialogue and its impact on economic uncertainty are also explored.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the market's reaction to the election uncertainty and the FBI investigation?

The market remained stable.

There was a significant increase in volatility.

The market showed a strong upward trend.

The market completely crashed.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the expected market reaction if Clinton wins the election?

A significant market crash.

A mild rally with increased confidence.

No change in the market.

A complete market shutdown.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How might a Trump win affect the market?

It would lead to a stable market.

It would cause a phase of uncertainty and increased volatility.

It would result in a strong market rally.

It would have no impact on the market.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What role does the Fed play in the post-election economic scenario?

The Fed controls the election outcomes.

The Fed is responsible for political decisions.

The Fed focuses on rate rises and economic stability.

The Fed has no role in the economic scenario.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How has the political dialogue changed due to the election?

The dialogue has become less focused on trade.

The dialogue has remained the same.

The dialogue has ignored economic issues.

The dialogue has shifted to include more counter trade rhetoric.