CLEAN : Rigging US election easier said than done experts say

The transcript discusses the improbability of rigging a presidential election due to the vast number of precincts and jurisdictions involved, making a massive conspiracy unlikely. It also highlights the challenges of fixing an election through software manipulation, given the presence of honest officials and robust testing systems. Additionally, it covers the potential for legal challenges and recounts, noting that while the Trump campaign might file lawsuits, courts are likely to uphold existing procedures.

Why is it considered unlikely to rig a presidential election in the U.S.?

• Due to the simplicity of the election process

• Because of the large number of precincts and jurisdictions involved

• Because elections are not monitored

• Due to the lack of interest in election outcomes

What would be necessary to successfully tamper with election results?

• A single computer expert

• A massive organized conspiracy

• A change in election laws

• A small group of people

What makes tampering with election software highly unlikely?

• The presence of honest election officials and testing systems

• The lack of technology

• The absence of software in elections

• The simplicity of the software

What legal action can be taken if there are strong indications of election irregularities?

• Recounting votes without any evidence

• Filing a formal challenge and submitting evidence in court

• Changing the election date

• Ignoring the results

How are courts likely to respond to lawsuits challenging election results?

• By immediately overturning the results

• By ignoring the lawsuits

• By calling for a new election

• By upholding existing procedures