CLEAN : Washington Post reporter talks Trump Foundation investigation

The transcript discusses the investigation into the Trump Foundation, highlighting issues of mixing charity with political campaigns. It explores the legal and ethical concerns surrounding the foundation's activities, particularly the lack of transparency and potential misuse of funds. The narrative also delves into Trump's unpredictable nature and how the charity story provided insights into his psyche. The story's complexity and involvement of various stakeholders made it suitable for social media engagement, offering a broader perspective beyond Trump's own statements.

What was one of the main reasons the narrator started investigating the Trump Foundation?

• The foundation was a new organization.

• The foundation was giving away too much money.

• The foundation was involved in a political campaign.

• The foundation was not registered properly.

What was a significant legal concern regarding the Trump Foundation?

• It was donating to international causes.

• It was not paying taxes.

• It was not registered as a charity.

• It was violating charity law by mixing with political activities.

How did the Trump Foundation's actions compare to typical charity law violations?

• They were minor and easily overlooked.

• They were innovative and new.

• They were typical and common.

• They were egregious and rare.

What makes the charity story different from other stories about Trump?

• It involves only Trump's personal statements.

• It includes other people and organizations.

• It is based on Trump's speeches.

• It focuses solely on Trump's business ventures.

What insight does the charity story provide about Trump?

• His political affiliations.

• His approach to appearing charitable.

• His business strategies.

• His family background.