PAKISTAN-FRANCE-BRITAIN-US-MILITARY-EXERCISES

PAKISTAN-FRANCE-BRITAIN-US-MILITARY-EXERCISES

Assessment

Interactive Video

Geography, History, Social Studies

9th - 10th Grade

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses the operations of the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle and the US carrier John C. Stennis, both supporting coalition forces in Afghanistan. It highlights the challenges of aerial missions in the Afghan terrain and the close collaboration between the French and US navies. The video also touches on the strategic presence of a second US carrier, the Eisenhower, in the Gulf amid rising tensions with Iran, emphasizing the show of force and international cooperation. Despite the collaboration, limitations exist in intelligence sharing between the two navies.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the primary mission of the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle in Afghanistan?

To transport supplies

To conduct naval exercises

To evacuate civilians

To support coalition ground forces

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What challenge do observation aircraft face during missions in the Afghan Uplands?

Lack of fuel

Adverse weather conditions

Communication issues

Uniform terrain making navigation difficult

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How do the French and American carriers coordinate their operations?

By conducting joint naval exercises

By coordinating air resources and comparing methods

By sharing intelligence data

By exchanging crew members permanently

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the aims of having multiple US carriers in the region?

To train new recruits

To provide humanitarian aid

To show force amidst tensions with Iran

To conduct scientific research

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a limitation in the relationship between the French and American navies?

Limited intelligence sharing

Different languages

Lack of communication

Incompatible technology