CLEAN : Britain may be stronger with no Syria

The transcript discusses the importance of avoiding past foreign policy mistakes and the potential for countries like the US and France to act independently based on their own objectives. It highlights the US's possible actions despite G20 considerations and the French approach to military action, emphasizing their independence from US influence.

What is one potential benefit of a country choosing a different foreign policy path from the US?

• Decreasing its global influence

• Increasing its standing on the world stage

• Losing international allies

• Weakening its economic power

What might the US consider when deciding whether to take action despite the G20 issue?

• The potential impact on their credibility

• The possibility of increasing trade

• The economic benefits of inaction

• The likelihood of gaining new allies

How might the US's decision to act or not act affect their international reputation?

• It would have no impact

• It might damage their credibility

• It could enhance their credibility

• It could lead to economic sanctions

What is a key factor in France's decision to take military action?

• Pressure from international organizations

• Their own foreign policy objectives

• Economic incentives from allies

• A desire to align with US interests

How does France traditionally approach its foreign policy decisions?

• By prioritizing the special relationship with the US

• By following the lead of other European countries

• By focusing on their own national interests

• By seeking approval from the United Nations