CLEAN: Teaching unions say free schools a 'dangerous distraction'

The video discusses the challenges and implications of free schools in England. It highlights the potential distractions they pose to students and the influence parents can exert on school funding. The concept of comprehensive grammar schools is critiqued, suggesting they are not truly comprehensive. The video also questions the transparency of the costs associated with free schools, arguing that funds could be better spent on state education.

What is a potential issue for students attending free schools compared to state schools?

• They have more extracurricular activities.

• They have better facilities.

• They face more distractions.

• They receive more personalized attention.

What can parents do if they disagree with local council decisions regarding schools?

• They can file a complaint with the Department for Education.

• They can move to a different district.

• They can set up their own school with state funding.

• They can vote to change the council.

What is implied by calling a school a 'comprehensive grammar'?

• It is a school that focuses on arts.

• It is a school for all students.

• It is essentially a grammar school.

• It is a school with no specific focus.

What is a concern about the funding of free schools?

• They are funded by private investors.

• They receive more funding than state schools.

• They use taxpayer money that could be spent on state education.

• They are funded by international organizations.

What is the Department for Education criticized for regarding free schools?

• Not offering enough extracurricular activities.

• Not building enough free schools.

• Not releasing the true costs of free schools.

• Not providing enough teachers.