CLEAN: Complacency contributed to London bombings: victims' relatives

The transcript discusses the heightened security measures post-9/11 and the risk of becoming complacent over time. It emphasizes the need for constant vigilance against new threats, including those from individuals acting independently. The speaker advocates for a public inquiry to address security challenges and learn from past events, particularly focusing on MI5's role and the events of the 7th of July.

What is the main concern expressed by the speaker regarding security measures after 9/11?

• The measures were too expensive.

• The measures were unnecessary.

• The measures were too strict.

• Complacency might set in over time.

According to the speaker, what is necessary to address the challenges highlighted by the inquest verdict?

• More public awareness campaigns.

• A public inquiry.

• Stricter laws.

• Increased funding for security services.

What does the speaker suggest about the role of MI5 before the events of 7/7?

• MI5 was not involved at all.

• MI5 was fully transparent.

• MI5 had no prior knowledge.

• MI5's actions need further investigation.

What is the speaker's view on the public inquiry related to the events of July 7th?

• It was ignored by the public.

• It was unnecessary.

• It was effectively conducted.

• It was too late.

How does the speaker perceive MI5's response to the public inquiry?

• MI5 was apologetic.

• MI5 was defensive.

• MI5 was transparent.

• MI5 was cooperative.