CLEAN : Doping: Kenya Olympic threat after WADA ruling

The video discusses the compliance issues related to anti-doping legislation in Kenya. It highlights the changes in the parliamentary process that led to non-compliance with international standards. Despite this, testing continues in Kenya. The video also addresses the disappointment in the decision and the implications for global policy, emphasizing the need for proper compliance by major countries.

What was the main issue with the legislative changes in Kenya?

• They were not communicated to the public.

• They did not align with international compliance standards.

• They were too expensive to implement.

• They were not approved by the local government.

Despite the non-compliance, what is still happening in Kenya?

• All testing has been outsourced.

• Testing is still taking place.

• Testing is only done in certain regions.

• No testing is being conducted.

How do the authorities feel about the current decision regarding compliance?

• They are satisfied with the decision.

• They are indifferent to the decision.

• They are disappointed with the decision.

• They are unaware of the decision.

What is the potential impact of a major country not being compliant?

• It could lead to more countries becoming compliant.

• It could undermine global standards.

• It could strengthen global standards.

• It could have no impact on global standards.

What does the non-compliance of a major country indicate about international policies?

• They are only applicable to smaller countries.

• They are irrelevant to most countries.

• They are not universally accepted.

• They are universally accepted.