CLEAN : Political expert notes 'extreme' vitriol in 2016 campaign

The transcript discusses a political figure's resignation and its impact on his reputation. It highlights the strategic moves of other candidates to gain his delegates for the upcoming convention. The discussion also covers the familiar yet extreme rhetoric used in campaigns, which some find entertaining despite its negativity.

What was the strategic benefit of the candidate stepping down in a classy manner?

• It helped them secure a position in the new government.

• It enabled other candidates to speak positively about them.

• It allowed them to avoid further debates.

• It allowed them to focus on personal matters.

What is the main reason other candidates are interested in the candidate's delegates?

• To form a new political alliance.

• To gain media attention.

• To increase their own delegate count for the convention.

• To prevent the candidate from returning to politics.

What is the candidate's likely focus at the convention?

• To form a coalition to oppose Trump.

• To announce a new political party.

• To retire from politics.

• To support all other candidates equally.

How does the public perceive the candidate's rhetoric?

• As unfamiliar and confusing.

• As innovative and groundbreaking.

• As entertaining and familiar.

• As boring and outdated.

What has been the trend in the level of vitriol in the campaign?

• It has become more positive.

• It has remained the same.

• It has decreased significantly.

• It has reached extreme levels.