CLEAN : Pistorius delaying the inevitable with appeal: criminal lawyer

The transcript discusses the legal context in the UK, focusing on Historia's bail conditions and compliance. It analyzes Pastorious's legal challenges, particularly his appeal prospects, and explains the minimum sentencing guidelines. The discussion highlights the crime committed by Pastorious, noting the absence of mitigating factors, and examines the broader context of violence and firearm abuse in South Africa, advocating for harsher sentences.

Why is Historia not considered a flight risk?

• He has a strong alibi.

• He has complied with all bail conditions.

• He has a diplomatic passport.

• He has been acquitted of all charges.

What is the main reason Pastorious is unlikely to succeed in his appeal?

• The Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment is clear and straightforward.

• He has not filed the appeal correctly.

• He has already served his sentence.

• The Constitutional Court does not handle such cases.

What is the role of minimum sentencing in the context of Pastorious's case?

• It is irrelevant to his case.

• It allows for immediate release on bail.

• It is a guideline that considers individual circumstances.

• It serves as a strict rule that must be followed.

What factor is NOT considered a mitigating circumstance for Pastorious?

• His remorse for the crime.

• His lack of prior convictions.

• His compliance with bail conditions.

• His disability.

Why does the speaker advocate for harsher sentences in South Africa?

• To align with international standards.

• To address the high rate of violence against women and firearm abuse.

• To reduce the prison population.

• To increase the number of appeals.