Kim Dotcom Lawyer: Why We Want to Livestream the Hearing

The transcript discusses a global legal case involving Kim Dotcom and Megaupload, focusing on the implications for user-generated content sites and cloud storage. The case raises important public policy issues, particularly regarding secondary copyright infringement and extradition laws. The discussion highlights the significance of live streaming the proceedings for public access and transparency, emphasizing the democratic values at stake.

Why is live streaming considered important for the Kim Dotcom case?

• It helps the judge make a fair decision.

• It allows the public to witness the proceedings.

• It ensures the safety of the participants.

• It prevents media bias.

What is the main legal challenge in extraditing Kim Dotcom?

• Ensuring a fair trial.

• Gathering enough evidence.

• Finding a suitable judge.

• Proving dual criminality.

What is secondary copyright infringement?

• Selling pirated content.

• Facilitating others to infringe copyright.

• Using copyrighted material for personal use.

• Directly copying content.

Why does the defense want the case to be live-streamed?

• To delay the proceedings.

• To showcase their confidence in their legal arguments.

• To gain public sympathy.

• To confuse the opposition.

What broader implications does the case have for internet service providers?

• It could lead to more government regulations.

• It might reduce their user base.

• It might increase their operational costs.

• It could change how they handle user-generated content.