Revert to your company values when facing a tough decision

Revert to your company values when facing a tough decision

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a business decision involving a partnership with a retailer. Initially, the decision seemed to threaten the brand, but it aligned with the company's core objective of generating funds for humanitarian projects. Despite losing brand distribution, the decision ultimately fulfilled the business's mission, raising over £10 million and impacting over 2 million lives in developing countries.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the main concern the speaker had about the partnership agreement?

It could harm the brand's relationship with the retailer.

It would require too much investment.

It would not generate enough revenue.

It was not aligned with the company's values.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is the core objective of the speaker's business?

To become the market leader in their industry.

To generate revenue for humanitarian projects.

To maximize profits for shareholders.

To expand the brand globally.

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did the speaker decide to proceed with the partnership despite potential brand harm?

The brand was already well-established in the market.

It aligned with the business's objective to raise funds for humanitarian causes.

The retailer offered exclusive distribution rights.

The partnership promised immediate financial gains.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the result of the partnership agreement with the retailer?

The brand gained massive distribution.

The partnership was terminated early.

The brand was removed from distribution.

The retailer expanded the brand's market reach.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did the decision to partner with the retailer impact the business's humanitarian goals?

It helped raise significant funds for humanitarian efforts.

It had no impact on the humanitarian goals.

It hindered the ability to fund projects.

It diverted resources away from humanitarian projects.