Sky News 2012 Olympics Coverage

Senior government ministers are working to assure the public that the Olympic Games are secure despite issues with private security firm G4S. The Defense Secretary has mobilized additional troops to fill gaps, emphasizing the military's readiness to serve. The Home Office was aware of G4S's recruitment problems but was assured they were being addressed. Authorities maintain that security is not compromised, and the involvement of more troops and police may enhance safety. The situation raises questions about G4S's significant role in the first place.

What was the main message conveyed by senior government ministers regarding the security of the games?

• The games will have limited public access.

• The games will be postponed due to security concerns.

• The games are secure despite the lack of private security guards.

• The games are in jeopardy due to lack of security.

Why is there public sympathy for the troops involved in the security of the games?

• They are being trained for new roles.

• They are receiving high salaries for their work.

• They are stepping in during a time of military job losses.

• They are on a vacation from their duties.

What did the Home Secretary admit regarding G4S?

• Recruitment issues were known but assurances were given.

• G4S had no recruitment issues.

• The Home Office was unaware of any problems.

• G4S was ahead of schedule in recruitment.

What is the perceived benefit of involving more troops and police in the games?

• It will ensure the games are more secure.

• It will delay the start of the games.

• It will increase the cost of the games.

• It will make the games less secure.

What question is raised about G4S's role in the games?

• Why was G4S not involved at all?

• Why was G4S given such a major role?

• Why was G4S given a minor role?

• Why was G4S chosen for a different event?