Ride Sharing to Me Is Really Hitchhiking: Daus

The transcript discusses the importance of thorough background checks for ridesharing drivers, comparing biometric fingerprint scans to name checks. It highlights the safety concerns associated with ridesharing services like Uber and Lyft, and the need for government involvement in vetting drivers. The conversation also touches on consumer awareness, data privacy, and the legal framework surrounding ridesharing. Uber's recent safety initiatives and the need for improved regulations are also discussed.

What is the main advantage of biometric fingerprint scans over name checks in background checks?

• They are more accurate and catch more fraud.

• They are cheaper to implement.

• They are faster to process.

• They require less personal information.

What was the role of the California Public Utilities Commission in the context of ride-sharing?

• They banned ride-sharing services.

• They allowed the concept of ride-sharing to be implemented.

• They introduced biometric fingerprint scans.

• They increased the fare for ride-sharing services.

Why are ride-sharing companies lobbying for fewer background checks?

• To comply with international standards.

• To have more control over the vetting process.

• To increase the number of drivers quickly.

• To reduce operational costs.

What is a significant risk associated with ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft?

• Longer wait times for rides.

• Limited availability in rural areas.

• Less accurate background checks.

• Higher fare rates compared to taxis.

What legal measure was taken in New York City to protect passenger data in taxis?

• Prohibiting taxi vendors from accessing passenger data.

• Implementing a data encryption system.

• Banning the use of GPS in taxis.

• Requiring passengers to consent to data sharing.