Mark Halperin: CIA's Torture Defenders Have Little Merit

The transcript discusses the polarized views on the torture report, highlighting the contrasting opinions of media outlets like MSNBC and Fox News. It delves into America's image, legal implications of torture, and the defenses presented by figures like Michael Hayden and Liz Cheney. The discussion also covers criticism and partisan views on the report, concluding with thoughts on its impact and the lessons learned.

What is the main reason the administration wants to discuss the torture report, according to the transcript?

• To highlight America's awesomeness

• To show how America is not awesome

• To defend the CIA's actions

• To promote bipartisan cooperation

What is the suggested action for those who committed torture if they are not prosecuted?

• Reward them

• Ignore their actions

• Pardon them

• Imprison them

Who are the two unpaid talking heads mentioned in the defense of the CIA's actions?

• Liz Cheney and George Bush

• Michael Vick and Liz Cheney

• Michael Hayden and Liz Cheney

• Michael Hayden and Michael Vick

What is the main criticism of the CIA defenders' arguments according to the transcript?

• They support the report's conclusions

• They fail to engage with the report's findings

• They focus on partisan politics

• They provide new evidence

What is the term used to describe making contradictory arguments in legal discussions?

• Arguing in the alternative

• Fog machine

• Prosecutorial screed

• Partisan play