Snub: Takata Defends Rejection of National Recall

Takata is in conflict with US regulators over a national recall of airbags linked to fatalities. The company argues that a nationwide recall is unnecessary and counterproductive, preferring a regional approach based on humidity levels. This stance was challenged in a congressional hearing, with lawmakers pushing for a nationwide recall. The government may impose a recall, leading to potential legal battles. Takata faces penalties, but they may not be substantial enough to impact the company significantly.

What is the main reason Takata is resisting a nationwide recall?

• They are waiting for more data from other countries.

• They have already replaced all faulty airbags.

• They want to save money on recall costs.

• They believe it is unnecessary and counterproductive.

What is Takata's primary argument for focusing on regional recalls?

• They have limited resources for replacements.

• They believe high humidity areas should be prioritized.

• They are following a new government directive.

• They want to avoid negative publicity.

How did members of Congress react to Takata's position during the hearing?

• They fully supported Takata's stance.

• They decided to delay any decision.

• They were indifferent to the arguments.

• They challenged and were disappointed with Takata's position.

What could be the maximum financial penalty Takata might face?

• $7,000 per minute per violation

• $35 million in total

• $100 million in total

• $50 million in total

What is the next step in the process if a government-mandated recall is imposed?

• Takata will issue a public apology.

• The recall will be canceled.

• A public hearing will be held for Takata to defend its position.

• Takata will immediately comply with the recall.