Former Prime Minister of Australia Says Trump Is Right

Kevin Rudd discusses the US strike on Syria, supporting Trump's decision as a necessary response to chemical weapon use. He contrasts this with Obama's 2013 decision. Rudd also examines the global perception of US leadership, noting skepticism but acknowledging the strike as a positive step. The discussion shifts to China's reaction, highlighting their opposition to chemical weapons but lack of direct support for the US action. Finally, Rudd addresses the implications for US-China relations and North Korea, suggesting the strike won't derail ongoing diplomatic efforts.

What was Kevin Rudd's opinion on President Trump's decision regarding Syria?

• He thought it was the right decision.

• He had no opinion.

• He believed it was too aggressive.

• He disagreed with it.

How did Kevin Rudd view the potential impact of the US strike on Syria on US global leadership?

• As irrelevant.

• As a step backward.

• As a step in the right direction.

• As a sign of weakness.

What was China's reaction to the US strike on Syria, according to Kevin Rudd?

• Complete silence.

• A nuanced stance opposing chemical weapons.

• Support for the US action.

• Direct condemnation.

How does Kevin Rudd describe the difference between the US actions in Syria and potential actions in North Korea?

• There is no difference.

• There is a significant difference.

• There is a slight difference.

• There is an ocean of difference.

What does Kevin Rudd suggest about the US-China relationship in light of the Syrian strike?

• It will become less important.

• It will improve significantly.

• It will remain important and unaffected.

• It will be severely affected.