Renault-Nissan Ties Get Even Shakier

The transcript discusses the ongoing conflict between Nissan and Renault, focusing on corporate governance issues. Renault has historically pushed for a closer alliance, even suggesting a merger, which Nissan resisted. Now, with Nissan in a weaker position, Renault is leveraging its influence to demand changes in Nissan's corporate governance. The discussion highlights the need for Nissan to improve its governance structure, acknowledging past lapses and the importance of reform.

What has been a long-standing issue between Nissan and Renault?

• Nissan's attempt to dominate the European market

• Renault's plan to exit the automotive industry

• Renault's push for a merger and Nissan's resistance

• Nissan's desire to acquire Renault

How has Renault responded to Nissan's corporate governance proposals?

• By proposing a new governance model

• By fully supporting them

• By using them as leverage for more influence

• By ignoring them completely

What is the nature of the corporate governance system proposed for Nissan?

• A single committee system

• A three committee system

• A shareholder-led governance model

• A two-tier board system

Why is it important for Nissan to improve its corporate governance?

• To expand into new markets

• To increase its market share

• To address past governance lapses

• To reduce production costs

What is Renault's stance on Nissan's corporate governance reforms?

• They fully oppose the reforms

• They support the reforms without any conditions

• They use the reforms as leverage despite not opposing specific provisions

• They have no interest in the reforms