Health Care Marks Day 1 Of Judge Barrett's Confirmation Hearings

The transcript covers the first day of Supreme Court confirmation hearings, focusing on judicial philosophy and the role of courts. Republicans defend their decision to hold hearings close to an election, while Democrats express concerns about the future of the Affordable Care Act. The hearings are contentious, with Republicans supporting Judge Barrett's qualifications and Democrats questioning the timing and implications for healthcare.

What is the primary role of courts according to the judiciary philosophy discussed?

• To interpret laws based on facts

• To solve all societal problems

• To make policy decisions

• To be accountable to the public

Why did Republicans defend their decision to conduct the hearings?

• They wanted to avoid a political discussion

• They were pressured by the public

• They wanted to delay the process

• They believed it was their constitutional duty

What was the main criticism from Democrats regarding the hearings?

• The timing was inappropriate

• The hearings were not public

• The nominee was not qualified

• The hearings were too lengthy

What specific issue did Democrats focus on during the hearings?

• The qualifications of the nominee

• The role of the judiciary

• The timing of the hearings

• The future of the Affordable Care Act

What potential impact could the Supreme Court's decision on the Affordable Care Act have?

• Expansion of healthcare coverage

• No significant impact

• Millions losing access to healthcare

• Increase in healthcare costs