CLEAN: How the far-right took hold in tolerant Nordic countries

The video discusses the emergence of a new form of right-wing extremism focused on anti-Muslim sentiments, which has been a growing concern. The unexpected attack aligns with these concerns, highlighting the influence of political rhetoric on society. The video also examines the impact of Breivik's actions on extremist groups, noting their distress and the potential weakening of their cause. It emphasizes the importance of careful rhetoric to avoid fostering hatred, suggesting that criticism of immigration can be expressed without inciting hostility.

What distinguishes the new form of right-wing extremism discussed in the video from traditional neo-Nazi extremism?

• It focuses on anti-Muslim sentiments.

• It is more violent.

• It is less organized.

• It has no political backing.

What is a common theme in the political ideas related to Muslim immigration in Norway?

• Muslim immigration is irrelevant.

• Muslim immigration is a crisis.

• Muslim immigration is beneficial.

• Muslim immigration is temporary.

How do some political figures in Norway describe the impact of Muslim immigration?

• As an economic opportunity.

• As a form of Islamization.

• As a minor issue.

• As a cultural enrichment.

How have extremist groups reacted to Breivik's actions?

• They are distressed by his actions.

• They have supported him.

• They have ignored him.

• They have become more active.

What is the suggested approach to discussing immigration to avoid inciting hatred?

• Be critical without creating hatred.

• Only discuss positive aspects.

• Avoid the topic entirely.

• Use aggressive rhetoric.